Legal Opinion

DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASETRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-1671.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 26, 2023No. 3:23-cv-01671Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ALEMAH MCMILLIAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 23-01671 (GC) (DEA) GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, OPINION GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, and GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendants. CASTNER, U.S.D.J. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company, Government Employees…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Alan Schmidt v. John SkolasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Davis v. Wells Fargo, U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  4. Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API