Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Williams

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 26, 1957PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

Plaintiffs are owners of properties in Delaware City. Their properties abut on a “private” alley which the de*311fendant has attempted to close on the ground that it is her property and plaintiffs are not entitled to use it.

Plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction declaring that they possess a reasonable-use easement in the alley and enjoining defendant from obstructing such use. Since defendant admittedly owns the fee to the alley, plaintiffs base their claim to an easement on either implication or prescription. Defendant denies that plaintiffs have sustained their right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anthony v. Kennard Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Howard v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Horne v. HopperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Marta v. TrinciaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. WilliamsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
  2. Biggs v. WolfeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  3. Biggs v. WolfeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
  4. Lickle v. Frank W. Diver, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  5. Rivas & Rivas, Inc. v. River Road Swimming ClubCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API