Legal Opinion
Vulcan Power Co. v. Munson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 10, 2011PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*495Defendants-appellants and defendant Munson, their representative, signed the stockholders agreement without reading it. Defendants-appellants, in fact, never requested a copy of the agreement, depending instead on the representations of Munson, who, in turn, depended upon the representations of people whose interests were at odds with his and who he believed to be untrustworthy. As a result, defendants are bound by the terms of the stockholders agreement (see Sorenson v Bridge Capital Corp., 52 AD3d 265, 266 [2008], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 748 [2009]; see also Pimpinello v Swift & Co., 253 NY…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pimpinello v. Swift & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Sorenson v. Bridge Capital Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- First National Bank v. FazzariNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Friedman v. FifeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. FalorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barclays Capital Inc. v. Giddens (In re Lehman Bros.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Burton v. Label, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Dasz, Inc. v. Meritocracy Ventures, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Mendoza v. Akerman Senterfitt LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Melvin v. MelvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.