Legal Opinion

Postell v. Budhu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Michael DeMarco, J.), entered on or about May 23, 2000, which denied the motion of defendants Ramjatan and Eesardeen Budhu for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Supreme Court properly denied the Budhu defendants’ motion for summary judgment since issues of fact exist with respect to whether they breached their contractual obligations to keep the premises in good repair (see, Putnam v Stout, 38 NY2d 607; and see, Russo v 491 W. St. Corp., 176 AD2d 672) and whether they had notice of the alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Juarez v. Wavecrest Management Team Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Putnam v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In re HsuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Russo v. 491 West Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API