Legal Opinion

Schulman v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 10, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

The plaintiff challenges the Attorney General’s certification of an initiative petition that, if successful, would amend the Massachusetts Constitution by providing, prospectively, that “the Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall define marriage only as the union of one man and one woman.” The petition was submitted to the Attorney General for certification pursuant to art. 48, The Initiative, Part II, § 3, of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution (art. 48), as amended by art. 74 of the Amendments. The plaintiffs challenge to the certification was filed in the county…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Ciardi v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  2. Strauss v. HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Regis College v. Town of WestonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Deal v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API