Legal Opinion

Claim of Deblasio v. New York City Department of Highways

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 21, 1996, which ruled that claimant’s current condition was not related to his employment.

In March 1984, claimant sustained an injury to his left arm while lifting a heavy object at work. Claimant subsequently began exhibiting symptoms of Parkinson’s disease, which eventually worsened to the point that claimant became totally disabled from his employment. Thereafter, in April 1992, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge determined that the March 1984 injury aggravated claimant’s preexisting Parkinson’s disease and found that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Curtis v. Adirondack TrailwaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Vermette v. Utica-Oswego Motor ExpressAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Claim of Barber v. Dayspring ConstructorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Tompkins v. Sunrise Heating Fuels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Claim of Zingler v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Henderson v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API