Corrigan v. National Motor Underwriters
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
— -Tins is an action to recover on a verbal contract of insurance. The cause was tried to the court and there was a finding and judgment ior plaintiff in the sum oí- $3183.28. Altor, motions ior a new trial and in arrest were overruled, "defendant lias appealed.
At the request of defendant, the court made a finding of facts which defendant adopts as- the facts in the case for the purposes of this appeal. Plaintiff adopts said statement in part. In addition to the facts stated in the court’s finding, plaintiff calls attention to the abstract of the record to the effect that A. J. Hagele who was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baile v. St. Joseph Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Breckinridge v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Kino v. Phoenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Lingenfelter v. Phœnix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
- Schilbrch v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cecil Corley Motor Co., Inc. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
- Huppert v. WolfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Chailland v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Voss v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.