Legal Opinion

Matter of City of New York v. . Schoeneck

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1916Published

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 25) 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the state board of equalization of the state of New York to convene and prepare a statement of the aggregate amounts of assessments upon which the state comptroller shall compute the state tax for 1915 for the five counties comprised in the city of…

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September 25) 1916, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus requiring the state board of equalization of the state of New York to convene and prepare a statement of the aggregate amounts of assessments upon which the state comptroller shall compute the state tax for 1915 for the five counties comprised in the city of New York, imposed pursuant to chapter 729 of the Laws of 1915, which statement shall include the assessed valuation of…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of People ex rel. City of Geneva v. Board of Supervisors (188 N. Y. 1).

Concur; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. City of Geneva v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API