Legal Opinion
Pearl Assur. Co. v. Harrington
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 2, 1941No. 746PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKFURTER, Circuit Justice.
Massachusetts, in common with other states, demands compliance with its notions of policy as expressed in a long sequence of legislation before an alien corporation can engage in the business of insurance within the Commonwealth. To its historic requirements, see Patterson, The Insurance Commissioner in the United States, p. 513 et seq., it added by a statute enacted in 1920 that such a corporation must have “as its resident manager in the United States, a citizen or corporation of the United States approved by the commissioner [of Insurance]”. Mass.Gen.Laws, c.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crown Kosher Super Market of Mass., Inc. v. GallagherDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Movement, Inc. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Crown Kosher Super Market of Mass., Inc. v. GallagherDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1959
- United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942