Legal Opinion

Bowman v. Friedman

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided January 24, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00675Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DANIELA BOWMAN, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:21-cv-00675-SCY CORDELIA FRIEDMAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on pro se Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Answer, filed October 27, 2021. Doc. 21. Plaintiff asks the Court to strike Defendant's Answer because "Defendant's Answer is untimely and as such the Defendant filed this Answer without seeking Leave of Court." Motion at 1. Although Defendant did not timely file her Answer, the Court has set aside the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Robert E. Kennedy, Jr. Joyce Kennedy v. City of Cleveland, William T. Hanton (85-3819), Frank Wszelaki (85-3827)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Operating Engineers Local 324 Health Care Plan v. G & W Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Billie Williams v. Jader Fuel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API