Legal Opinion · Dissent

Foster v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1994No. S94A0181Published

1DissentSears-Collins, Justice

I cannot agree with the majority’s implication, see footnote 2 of majority opinion, that voluntary manslaughter is not an authorized verdict when a defendant is reasonably provoked by one person and shoots at that person, accidentally killing a bystander. Nor can I agree with the majority’s bolding that the principles of Edge v. State, 261 Ga. 865 (414 SE2d 463) (1992), do not apply to this case. I therefore dissent.

1. I first take issue with footnote 2 of the majority opinion in which the majority questions whether Foster was even entitled to a charge on voluntary manslaughter. I believe…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Edge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  3. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  4. State v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. McLendon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API