Legal Opinion

State v. Santiago

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2010No. 31,247PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

{1} The subject of a first-degree murder prosecution, Defendant successfully moved to suppress incriminating evidence that the police obtained from his house on the basis that the warrant did not authorize a nighttime search. Rather than proceed to trial without the evidence, the State appealed the suppression directly to this Court.

{2} We address for the first time this Court’s Rule 5-211(B) NMRA, which requires special permission to conduct a nighttime search. We discuss the rule’s rationale and explain the circumstances that trigger its application. We hold that when…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FarishNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Davis v. New Mexico Department of Game and FishDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API