Legal Opinion

Little v. Bowen

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided October 12, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal of Mrs. Franklin Little from decree of circuit court of Clarke county, in three suits heard together, viz: Fowle, Snowden & Co. v. Franklin Little, wife and als.; W. L. Chipley and als. v. Same, and Sarah M. Bowen v. Same. The facts essential to the understanding of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.

A brief statement of this case is necessary to make the opinion intelligible.

Henry M. Bowen died seized in fee of a tract of land containing about 370 acres. He died intestate, and his wife and seven children survived him. One of the sons purchased the share of a brother and conveyed the shares he owned (two-sevenths), the one acquired by purchase and the other inherited, in trust to secure three bonds of $1,000 each to the vendor, who assigned them to Fowle, Snowden & Co. The purchaser then sold and conveyed the two shares to Franklin Little, subject to the trust deed. Little subsequently…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garland v. PamplinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Couch v. EasthamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Edmunds' Adm'r v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  3. Evans v. SpurginSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  4. Venator Group Specialty, Inc. v. MLK Associates, L.P.Fairfax County Circuit Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API