Legal Opinion
Maritrans G.P., Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 12, 1990No. 63 E.D. Miscellaneous Docket 1990PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
Petitioners filed an Emergency Application For A Stay Or An Order Restoring The Preliminary Injunction Pending Disposition On Application For Petition For Review (In The Nature Of An Appeal) on April 5, 1990, together with an Emergency Motion for A Hearing. Respondents filed a Brief In Opposition To The Emergency Application For A Stay of the March 29, 1990, Judgment Of A Panel Of The Superior Court. A hearing was held April 9, 1990, in chambers. Petitioners unsuccessfully sought to meet the requirements for the grant of a stay. At the close of the day,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Blue Ridge Gas Company, Intervenor. Petition for Review of Order of the Federal Power Commission, No. 14583. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, Appeal From United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- In Re Estate of PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Process Gas Consumers GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- In re SoppickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Com. v. McKeever, V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- In Re Set Aside the Nomination Petition of FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.