Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 12, 1999No. Criminal 98-338PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge.

This case requires this Court to determine whether the Government can cure the unexpected failure of its principal trial witnesses to identify the defendant by offering expert testimony which was never disclosed to defense counsel prior to trial. In addition, if the Court precludes the Government from offering this expert testimony, the Government seeks to rescind an agreement to use a post-arrest statement made by the Defendant for impeachment purposes only, and introduce the statement in its case-in-chief. More specifically, before me is the motion of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GasparikDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API