Legal Opinion

Fryar v. Hamilton County

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1929PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Plaintiff in error sued Hamilton County, the County Superintendent of Eoads, and the County Highway Commission for damages to his land caused by overflow of surface water from ditches and drains along the highway. He stated in the declaration that it was the dirty of defendants to maintain the road and set forth their failure to keep open and in repair the ditches and drains where it passed near his property, causing the water to concentrate in unusual quantities along the east boundary of his land where it was discharged, hooding the land and impairing the use of his buildings.

It was charged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. JohnstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Vance v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Vance v. HaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thomas v. GroeblTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Buckholtz v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. Mark C. Walker & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  5. Powell v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API