Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Johnson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1952No. 10414PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Given, Judge:

This proceeding in eminent domain was instituted by The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, defendant in error, for the purpose of acquiring title to a lot of land situated in Huntington. Elizabeth Johnson, plaintiff in error, was the owner of the land title to which was sought to be acquired, being the rear or northerly thirty by thirty feet of Lot 4 of Block 181, Addition No. 1, in Huntington. A previous writ of error granted to the condem-nor was before this Court. The opinion disposing of the questions before the Court on that writ of error is reported in 134 W. Va. 619, 60…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. DriverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. McCauslandWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Buckhannon & Northern Railroad v. Great Scott Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Guyandot Valley R'y Co. v. BuskirkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Frampton v. Consolidated Bus Lines, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Road Commission v. FergusonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Graham v. WristonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Butler v. Smith's Transfer Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. West Virginia Division of Highways v. ButlerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Campbell v. CampbellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API