Legal Opinion

Thurston Enters., Inc. v. Safeguard Bus. Sys., Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2019No. Docket No. 45092PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevan, Justice

This appeal arises from Safeguard Business Systems, Inc.'s ("SBS") alleged breach of its distributorship agreement with Thurston Enterprises, Inc. ("Thurston"). After a jury trial Thurston was awarded approximately $6.8 million in damages. SBS filed a motion for post-judgment relief, which the district court denied. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On June 1, 1987, Thurston and SBS entered into a distributor agreement (the "Agreement"), which granted Thurston the right to solicit orders of Safeguard products designated as "Safeguard Systems" from customers.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Badgett v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Stephens v. StearnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Alsco v. Fatty's BarIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Asher v. McMillanIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Hawes v. Western Pacific Timber LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Griffiths v. GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API