Legal Opinion
Noeling v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 21, 1949PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George D. Noeling was convicted of violating F.S.A. § 797.01, relating to abortion, and he appeals.
Reversed. Appellant was convicted of violating Section 797.01, Fla. Stat. 1941, F.S.A., relating to abortion, and appeals.
He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We shall not comment upon that question because we have concluded that the several errors committed in the trial are of such nature and degree as to vitiate the trial and any expression by us on the sufficiency of the evidence should, for that reason, be deferred.
The charge is clearly defined by the statute. The issue was simple.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. ReddyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Trapp v. Territory of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- MacKiewicz v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Lawhorne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Kirkland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Metropolitan Dade County v. ZapataDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.