Legal Opinion

Belknap v. Hunt

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1919No. Civil No. 1612PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Maricopa denying writ of mmdamus. Prank O. Smith, Judge.

1Per curiam

The appellant, Belknap, brought suit in m-amdamm against the appellees, constituting the state land department and the state land commissioner, to compel them to enter into a contract of sale to him of 29.5 acres of school land, the same being a part of section 16, situate in Maricopa county. The complaint shows that both the land and improvements had been appraised as provided by law, and that the appellant, at a public sale of the land, had bidden it in at the appraised value; and that appellees refused to execute the contract of sale and issue the certificate of purchase until and unless…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Del Rio Land, Inc. v. HaumontCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API