Legal Opinion

Walton v. Astrue

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 18, 2011No. Case 3:09CV2869PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BENITA Y. PEARSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Jack Walton (‘Walton”) seeks judicial review of the Social Security Administration’s (“Agency” or the “Commissioner”) final decision denying his applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income (“benefits”), pursuant to ¿2 U.S.C. § k05(g).

After reviewing the administrative record and the applicable legal standards, the Court finds that the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision, as written, is not based upon proper legal standards or sup ported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the Court…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  2. Anthony D. Harris v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
  3. Avery v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
  4. Avila v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
  5. Bryant v. Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API