Progressive Miners of America Local Union No. 109 v. Peabody Coal Co.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
. WHAM, District Judge.
This case is now before the court solely upon the questions raised by the motions filed by the defendants under special and limited appearances for that purpose only, to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended bill for want of necessary parties, and for want of jurisdiction. For the purpose of disposing of said motions, all of the well-pleaded allegations of the plaintiffs’ bill, as amended, will be taken as true except the allegation that the defendant Peabody Coal Company executed the President’s re-employment agreement and the allegation relating thereto set forth in paragraphs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Texas & NOR Co. v. Brotherhood of Ry. & Steamship ClerksSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harper v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Hary v. United Electric Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1934
- Progressive Miners of America v. Peabody Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- United States v. SmelserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937