Legal Opinion

Landsberger v. Magnetic Telegraph Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Question of costs.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

The plaintiff recovered in this action $16.09. The defendant claims to be entitled to costs under section 305 of the Code.

By section 304, it is clear that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover costs; and by section 305, the defendant is entitled to costs of course—'Unless the plaintiff is, under the previous section.

I should have no difficulty in applying this rule to the present case, were it not for the decision of the general term in Bait a. Lignot (3 Abbotts' Pr. R., 190), in which case it was held that the defendant was not entitled to costs in a case where the plaintiff recovered…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laney v. IngallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Paulson v. SorensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Ury v. WildeThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1888
  4. Ury v. WildThe Superior Court of New York City · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API