Legal Opinion

Swain v. Nasworthy

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 4, 1907No. 373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Distraint, from city court of Abbeville—Judge Nicholson. February 15, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

1. Upon the trial of a case arising from the filing of a counter-affidavit and replevy bond to- the foreclosure of a distress warrant, the defendant can not properly move to dismiss the levy on the ground that it is excessive.

2. The effect of filing the counter-affidavit and bond is to render the process mesne; and the proceeding becomes a suit to recover rent, the distress warrant operating as a declaration and the counter-affidavit as a, plea. Chisholm v. Lewis, 66 Ga. 729; Elam v. Hamilton, 69 Ga. 736; Seifert v. Holt, 80 Ga. 757, 9 S. E. 843.

3. The tenant’s remedy against an excessive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reid v. Mayor of EatontonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Seifert v. HoltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  3. Elam v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Chisholm v. Lewis & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beavers v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Kirsch v. WittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Harrington v. NeeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Foy v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API