Legal Opinion

City of Honolulu v. Sherretz

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1957No. 3077PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*178OPINION OP THE COURT BY

STAINBACK, .1.

In this case the City and County of Honolulu, plaintiff-appellant, alleged in its petition dated the 5th day of June, 1953, that the defendant-appellee, D. Ransom Sherretz, as director of personnel of the department of civil service of the City and County of Honolulu did on February 1, 1949, illegally certify for employment by the City and County one Kershner Clark Warford as a civil service worker in good standing; it further alleged that the defendantappellee as such director had, in direct violation of civil service laws, rules and regulations, approved…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. The United States v. James and John G. Daniel, Executors of Beverly Daniel, Late U. S. MarshalSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  3. Davis v. State ex rel. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bishop v. LokanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Alameda v. SpenserHawaii Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Mitsuba Publishing Co. v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API