Legal Opinion

Walz v. Peninsular Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1922No. Docket No. 102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

A rehearing was granted in this case for the reason that in paragraph 9 of the opinion, reported in 221 Mich. 326, the case of Lindemann v. Insurance Co., 217 Mich. 698, is cited as decisive of the question there discussed. It is not. That Act No. *418128, Pub. Acts 1911 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 9481), was repealed by Act No. 256, Pub. Acts 1917 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 9100 [1-339]), and not re-enacted until the taking effect of Act No. 264, Pub. Acts 1921 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 9100 [254]), was overlooked, the policy having issued and the loss having occurred during the interval between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walz v. Peninsular Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lindemann v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Fenton v. Cascade Mutual Fire Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rogoski v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Rogoski v. StreeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API