Churchill v. Brock
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
264 Wis. 23 (1953)
CHURCHILL, Appellant,
vs.
BROCK and another, Respondents.[*]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
April 1, 1953.
May 5, 1953.
For the appellant there was a brief by Rubin & Ruppa, attorneys, and Nathan Ruppa and William B. Rubin of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Nathan Ruppa and William B. Rubin.
For the respondents there was a brief by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Austin W. Kivett of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Austin W. Kivett.
FAIRCHILD, J.
The only serious dispute as to the facts in this action is with relation to the manner in which the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Klein v. BeetenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Williams v. HolbrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Hamilton v. ReinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Kempfer v. BoisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.