Legal Opinion

Friedlander Bros. v. City of Moultrie

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 27, 1923No. 3206PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The assessment was made in pursuance of section 32 of the act approved Nov. 20, 1901 (Act 1901, p. 591), entitled “An act to create a new charter for the City of Moultrie,” etc. That section reads in part as follows: “Be it further enacted, that said mayor and aldermen shall, at the first meeting after the close of the tax books in the year 1902, elect three (3) intelligent, upright, discreet citizens of said city, as city tax-assessors, one of which shall be elected for a term of one year, one for a term of two years, and one for a term of three years. .…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Doe ex dem. Truluck v. PeeplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  2. Fain v. GarthrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  3. Bond v. Central BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Shippen Bros. Lumber Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Doe ex dem. Clements v. RoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Macon v. RiesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Simmons v. NewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API