Legal Opinion

Fulop v. Suta

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided December 10, 2002No. 2001-CA-01553-COAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIDGES, J.,

for the court.

¶ 1. Jeno Fulop brings this appeal from a decision of the Lafayette County Chancery Court dismissing his breach of contract action against Frank Suta as barred by the statute of frauds and time-barred by the statute of limitations. Fulop filed a motion to reconsider that the court denied. Fulop then timely perfected his appeal to this Court.

STATEMENT OF ISSUES

I. DID THE CHANCELLOR ERR WHEN HE DISMISSED FULOP’S CASE AS BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF FRAUDS?

II. DID THE CHANCELLOR ERR WHEN HE DISMISSED FULOP’S ACTION AS TIME-BARRED BY *895THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS?

STATEMENT OF…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tricon Metals & Services, Inc. v. ToppMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Smith v. HC Bailey CompaniesMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Eastline Corp. v. Marion Apartments, Ltd.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Continental Ins. Co. v. TRANSAMER. RENTAL FINANCE CORP.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrow v. MayCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  2. Steve Allen, Harry Allen and Hunter Allen v. Steven Featherstone Dickerson, Alyson Lee Dickerson, Individually and as Next Best Friend for Minor Children G.D. and E.D.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API