Legal Opinion

People v. Pitto

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2008No. S139609PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Penal Code section 120221 provides various sentence enhancements for those who are “armed” (id., subd. (a)), or in some cases, “personally armed” (id., subd. (c)), with a firearm “in the commission of’ specified offenses. In People v. Bland (1995) 10 Cal.4th 991 [43 Cal.Rptr.2d 77, 898 P.2d 391] (Bland), which involved the arming enhancement for assault weapons (§ 12022, subd. (a)(2)), we set forth the circumstances in which the trier of fact could infer that the defendant was “armed” with a gun “in the commission of’ a drug crime, and the finding could thus be upheld as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Watson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. ElderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. BrimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. ElderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. Eaton CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API