Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Garrett

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 26, 1992No. 1901963PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court granted Phillip Garrett's petition for a writ of certiorari to review his argument that the affirmance by the Court of Criminal Appeals of his conviction conflicts with cases such as Mauldin v. State, 402 So.2d 1106 (Ala.Crim.App. 1981), on the question whether the State met its burden of proof in the admission of evidence against him. Specifically, Garrett argues that the State did not establish an unbroken chain of custody of the marijuana introduced into evidence as proof of the State's charge of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance. We find the citation to Mauldin to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HoltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Mauldin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SlatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API