Legal Opinion

Aders v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1925No. 6 Div. 705PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of forgery and appeals.

The indictment, in the Code form, sets out in hsee verba the instrument the forging or uttering of which is relied upon for a conviction. This instrument appears to bear date of December 23, 1923, which this court knows judicially fell on Sunday, and it is such an instrument as that by terms of the statute (Code 1923, § 6821), being executed on that day, it is void. As said by our Supreme Court in the case of Hobbs v. State, 75 Ala. 1:

“A writing, void on its face because of the want of legal requisites to its validity, is not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rembert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Hobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Burden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. Fomby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gooch v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Crow v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Nikolic v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Farris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API