Legal Opinion

Karl Kiefer Mach. Co. v. U. S. Bottlers Machinery Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 18, 1939No. 6985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

This was a complaint charging appellee with the infringement of two separate and distinct patents by two separate and distinct acts of infringement, and praying for an injunction and accounting.

Prior to filing an answer, appellee moved to dismiss the bill on the ground of failure to state a, claim upon which relief could be granted. After due consideration the District Court, on March 1, 1939, 27 F. Supp. 300, dismissed the bill as to patent No. 1572150, not staying the enforcement of its judgment, and ordered that appellee answer the bill in so far as it pertained to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Ex Parte TiffanySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Merriman v. Chicago & E. I. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  4. Karl Kiefer Mach. Co. v. United States Bottlers Machinery Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sidis v. FR Pub. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Asher v. RuppaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Town of Clarksville, Va. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  4. Clarence Stewart, Jr. v. O. E. Bishop, Superintendent of Arkansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  5. Florian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API