Legal Opinion
Flemington National Bank & Trust Co. v. Domler Leasing Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1979PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the majority at the Appellate Division, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Vincent A. Lupiano, that Domler’s obligation under the repurchase *680agreement did not extend to the Roselle-Twintex lease which had been assigned by Yegen to appellant bank more than two months prior to the execution of the repurchase agreement.
We find it unnecessary to reach or consider other issues.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Caprer v. NussbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Barnum v. Millbrook Care Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Perlbinder v. Board of Managers of the 411 East 53rd Street CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Grossman v. Laurence Handprints-N.J., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Colello v. ColelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.