Legal Opinion
Nebelung v. Norman
California Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1939No. S. F. 16266PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After further consideration of this cause, we find ourselves in accord with the opinion of the District Court of Appeal as prepared by Mr. Justice Spence of the First District, Division Two, and we hereby adopt the same as the opinion of this court. It is as follows:
“The three plaintiffs brought this action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by them in an automobile accident. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and a judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant, Laher Spring & Tire Corporation. By said judgment,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Stultz v. Benson Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Smith v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lawrence v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Campbell v. American Foreign SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Benton v. SlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.