Cohen & Hammond, Inc. v. Arnold
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
This is an action on a replevin bond. The case is before us on a report, which states that due execution of the bond and proper demand for the return of the replevied property were admitted. At the trial of this action to recover on the bond, the defendants offered to show that the automobile replevied, when the writ of replevin was served, was not “ the property of the present plaintiff, but was the property of another, and was taken on May 26,1921, from a person who had acquired supposed title to it from the defendant, Arnold, prior thereto.” The exclusion of this evidence presents the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leonard v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Barry v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Smith v. MosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Easter v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westminster National Bank v. GrausteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- City of Bridgeport v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Sullivan v. MartinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
- Kelly v. Kremer Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929