Legal Opinion
Grandal Enterprises, Inc. v. Keansburg Borough
New Jersey Tax Court
Decided June 16, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILL, J.T.C.
The following opinion is submitted pursuant to R. 2:5 — 1(b). It supplements a bench opinion of February 10, and reiterates a letter opinion of May 5. The opinion sets forth my findings and conclusions with respect to plaintiff Grandal Enterprises’ application for Freeze Act relief.
Plaintiff appeals my order of February 14,1995 denying as moot its Freeze Act application for Block 184, Lot 4 for the 1993 and 1994 tax years. After hearing argument on January 20, 1995 and February 10, 1995, I denied the application because the assessor had in fact entered the 1993 and 1994…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Riverview Gardens, Section One, Inc. v. Borough of North ArlingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- City of Newark v. FischerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Slowinski v. Valley Nat. BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Clearview Gardens Associates v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- 18 Washington Place Associates v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Tax Court · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- GRANDAL ENT. v. Borough of KeansburgNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996