Legal Opinion

Carter v. Maloff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1998No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for emotional injuries he allegedly suffered when his son’s remains were disinterred nearly eight months after burial and the casket was discovered to be filled with water. Supreme Court granted the motions of defendants Columbia Casket Corporation and Kenco Manufacturing Co., Inc. (Kenco), and the application of defendant Jan Maloff, individually and doing business as Dewitt Memorial Funeral Home (Maloff), for summary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brady v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. McGill v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Tony's Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. National Building & Restoration Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Coffey v. United States Gypsum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Massaro v. Charles J. O'Shea Funeral Home, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Carter v. MaloffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API