Legal Opinion
Lage v. Weinstein
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 15, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, sixth district, borough of Manhattan.
1Per curiam
This action was for goods sold and delivered; the defense interposed was a general denial and counterclaim. The plaintiff’s claim was that he sold and delivered 2268 square feet of tiling in pursuance of an agreement made and entered into between himself and the defendant Jacob Weinstein. This agreement is attached to the return and is in the following words:
“ Jacob Weinstein,
“ 235 East Thirteenth Street, City.
“ Dear Sir: You will confer a favor upon me by giving to Mr. Lage your acceptance of your guarantee for payment of tiles *299which will be delivered to your job at 235 East Thirteenth…
2Cited by4 opinions
- E. J. Codd Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Grinder v. Bryans Road Building & Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Schuling v. ErvinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Swartwout v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910