Legal Opinion

Stephens v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On writ of error to Monmouth Sessions.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beasley, Chief Justice.

The indictment in this case contained two counts, the first laying a charge of embezzlement, the second of larceny. The language of the jury in announcing their verdict was, “ that they find the defendant guilty of larceny and embezzlement as he stands charged in the indictment.”

From this statement two things are obvious, viz., that the jury convicted the defendant of two distinct offences, and that the court has punished such offences conjointly and not . separately.

It will be noticed that the case does not belong to the class…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. CareyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RadonWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Springdale Park, Inc. v. AndriotisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. State v. KaufmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. State v. MishlerOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State v. BarrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API