Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 24, 1973No. 46591PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

Appeal is taken from a conviction for murder. Punishment was assesed by the jury at twenty years.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.

At the outset, appellant contends that the record does not reflect that there was a duly authorized judge presiding at the trial of this cause.

Appellant urges that the administrative assignment of the Hon. R. W. Wil-liford to the 177th District Court is invalid and does not authorize Judge Williford to try cases in the 176th District Court in which this cause was tried. Arguments advanced by appellant under this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Frison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Childs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Peach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hoffert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Carey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Beecham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Pearce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API