Legal Opinion

Perlman v. East Annadale Beach Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 27, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

Each of the defendants, of whom there are three — two corporate and one individual — challenges the complaint for insufficiency and moves for a dismissal of it under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Plaintiff bought two lots on Staten Island. The consideration was $1,900, and the -payments were to be made monthly in the sum of $19. The defendant corporations appear to have been interlocked, the Annadale Company being owned, controlled and managed by the White Company, the latter having “ exclusive charge of the collection of monies due under the contract.” The Annadale Company,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weed v. . SpearsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lesavoy Industries, Inc. v. Providence Washington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. In re the Estate of PrimeNew York Surrogate's Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API