Legal Opinion
State v. Banet
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 30, 1953PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendant was charged with the crime of larceny under § 8401 of the General Statutes. He was tried to the court and found guilty. The question on his appeal is whether the evidence established his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The trial court could reasonably have found the following facts: The defendant was a dealer in used automobiles, doing business as the Fairfield Auto Mart, Inc. On August 15,1950, he sold and delivered a 1940 DeSoto sedan to Wiley Dukes for $425 upon a conditional sale contract which acknowledged the receipt of $70 cash and provided for payment of the balance in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. EnannoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. VarsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- State v. RaffoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- State v. MarraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. CalonicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.