Legal Opinion
Rosenshein v. Guillen
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank Composto, J.
Plaintiff moves for a new trial in this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien and defendants cross-move for the entry of judgment pursuant to CPLR 9002. The question before the court is whether judgment may be entered pursuant to CPLR 9002 in the absence of signed decisions.
This matter was tried before the late Justice McGroarty in November of 1974 without a jury and decision was reserved. Both parties waived the submission of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Both parties received copies of a lengthy memorandum decision dated April 17, 1975 which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Union Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Lindt v. Solomon R. Guggenheim FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Andersen v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- New York State Labor Relations Board v. America Marble Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Anderson v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Holm-Beer v. HolmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Plunkett v. Emergency Medical ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1995