Commonwealth v. Monville
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for retail theft. 1 Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction. 2 We agree. Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is reversed and appellant ordered discharged.
The Commonwealth’s only witness was John J. McConnell, the Inspector of Security at the John Wanamaker Store at which the incident in question occurred. Appellant testified in her own defense, and gave an entirely innocent explanation of the incident, but since at this stage the Commonwealth is entitled to have the evidence regarded in the light…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. VogelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. CrowsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BonnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Karkut v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. KeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Rabii Baghdad v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Commonwealth v. KeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.