Legal Opinion

Ethredge v. Diamond Drill Contracting Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1938No. 27074. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

— Plaintiff, John H. Ethredge, being the owner of a tract of land in Chelan county, Washington, which he believed might contain deposits of oil or gas, entered into a contract, bearing date October 7, 1936, with defendant, Diamond Drill Contracting Company, a Washington corporation, whereby defendant agreed to drill a test well on plaintiff’s property, using the diamond drill method, the drilling to proceed at the plaintiff’s option, so long as financed by him in accordance with the agreement. If plaintiff desired that casing be used, he should provide the same, to be installed at defendant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sherman v. SweenyWashington Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ethredge v. Diamond Drill Contracting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Detroit Edison Company v. ZonerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Detroit Edison Company v. ZonerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re Johnson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API