Legal Opinion

X.Z. v. H.D.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 9, 2018No. 18-P-1Published

1Opinion of the Court

A judge of the Superior Court dismissed, without prejudice, a complaint brought by X.Z. against his wife, H.D. The motion judge dismissed the case on the basis that the complaint was a restatement of an action previously filed in 2014. See Mass. R. Civ. P. 12 (b) (9), as amended, 450 Mass. 1403 (2008). We affirm.

" Rule 12(b)(9) provides for the dismissal of a second action in which the parties and the issues are the same as those in a prior action still pending in a court of this Commonwealth. The rule prohibits the long-barred practice of claim-splitting." (Footnote omitted.) Lyons v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chokel v. Genzyme Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Kunen v. First Agricultural National BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  3. Shawmut Community Bank, N.A. v. ZagamiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. M.J. Flaherty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Lyons v. DuncanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API