Legal Opinion

Wagemann v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Jlppeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner’s Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRyland, Judge

The plaintiff commenced his action in the law commissioner’s court against the defendant, where he obtained judgment by default, the defendant failing to answer the plaintiff’s petition. This judgment by default was entered on the 11th of *504October, 1858, and an inquiry of damages was ordered for the 14th of the same month. On the 14th of October, the plaintiff appeared by his attorney, and waived a jury and submitted the cause to the court. The court, hearing the evidence, assessed the plaintiff’s damages at the sum of one hundred dollars.

On the 21st of October, the defendant, by his attorney,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Field v. MatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1844
  2. Faber v. BrunerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
  3. Austin v. NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  4. Green v. GoodloeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
  5. Weimer v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dalton v. McCafferyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Sprung v. Negwer Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Sprung v. Negwer Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API