Legal Opinion

Bowles-Snailer v. Texoma Labs, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 2023No. 6:22-cv-00139Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA COURTNEY BOWLES-SNAILER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-22-139-RAW-GLJ ) TEXOMA LABS, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER Following a motion for default judgment in this case, this Court entered Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Courtney Bowles-Snailer against Texoma Labs, Inc. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees [Docket No. 48]. The Court referred this motion to the undersigned Magistrate Judge for final disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) [Docket No. 50]. For the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Case v. Unified School District No. 233Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Robinson v. City of EdmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Caldo Mares and Sally Mares, His Wife v. Credit Bureau of Raton, and Janet Yarbrough, Individually, and in Her Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API