Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Montgomery County
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 5, 1972No. [No. 64, September Term, 1972.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
The appellants, Walter J. Murphy, Jr. and Joan W. Murphy, his wife, owners of the property, 6012 Tilden Lane, Rockville, Montgomery County, in the Luxmanor Subdivision, challenge the validity of a special benefit front-foot assessment levied against their property by the appellee, Montgomery County, assessing a portion of the cost of the reconstruction of Tilden Lane. Their principal contention is that they have been denied due process of law. We have concluded that the order of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, dated March 20 and filed on April 6, 1972 (Moorman, J.), dismissing the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Mayor of Baltimore v. BiermannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Albert v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Williams v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Montgomery County v. SchultzeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Patterson v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Sulzer v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.